home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT0505>
- <link 89TT2889>
- <title>
- Mar. 11, 1991: Then There Was One
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Mar. 11, 1991 Kuwait City:Feb. 27, 1991
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BUSINESS, Page 69
- Then There Was One
- </hdr><body>
- <p>The Senate ethics panel spears Cranston but spares the rest
- </p>
- <p> The timing almost seemed designed for minimum exposure, like
- putting a rerun of Nova up against Cheers. The day the whole
- world was watching the gulf war end was the moment the Senate
- Select Committee on Ethics chose to issue its long-delayed
- report on the Keating Five. The committee found that only the
- aged, ailing California Senator Alan Cranston, 76, had engaged
- in "impermissible conduct" in which "fund raising and official
- activities were substantially linked." The case of the Keating
- One will be referred to the whole Senate for possible action.
- The other four are officially off the hook.
- </p>
- <p> The findings came after a 14-month investigation detailing
- how more than $1 million in contributions, four trips to the
- Bahamas and all-expense-paid stays at resort hotels found their
- way from indicted savings and loan executive Charles Keating,
- who needed protection from federal regulators trying to shut
- him down, to five U.S. Senators and their staffs. The committee
- found Senators John Glenn of Ohio ($234,000 in Keating
- contributions) and John McCain of Arizona ($112,000) the least
- culpable, engaging only in "poor judgment" because they gave
- Keating less help than did the others. Senators Donald Riegle
- of Michigan ($76,000) and Dennis DeConcini of Arizona ($55,000
- along with more than $50 million in real estate loans from
- Lincoln Savings to top campaign aides) gave the "appearance of
- being improper" because their intervention for Keating was more
- extensive.
- </p>
- <p> Fred Wertheimer, president of the citizens' lobby Common
- Cause, which initially demanded the investigation, was outraged
- at the lenient treatment, and angrily commented: "The U.S.
- Senate remains on the auction block to the Charles Keatings of
- the world." Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen, called
- the report a "whitewash."
- </p>
- <p> The committee's ruling offered no guidance as to what is
- legal and illegal. All five helped Keating and all five
- accepted money during the same period of time. But only
- Cranston, who received $982,000 from the S&L kingpin, failed
- to observe a respectful amount of time between service rendered
- and money collected. DeConcini hosted a high-level meeting at
- which he outlined Keating's demands, which gave an "appearance
- of being improper" in the eyes of the ethics panel. Glenn, who
- arranged a luncheon for Keating with then Speaker Jim Wright,
- was deemed merely to have "exercised poor judgment."
- </p>
- <p> The committee recommended that the Senate draw up new
- guidelines governing constituent service and campaign finances.
- For now, there are no written rules distinguishing between the
- sort of constituent service that helps a citizen collect
- Medicare benefits and service that consists of organizing
- secret meetings and high-level luncheons or making threatening
- calls to federal regulators. While large sums changed hands,
- the report pointed out, no one was personally enriched by
- Keating's largesse. Nonetheless the committee seemed to overlook
- the fact that, among those who lust for power, money in the
- campaign treasury is a much bigger carrot than money in the
- pocket.
- </p>
- <p> It may be left to the voters to decide the ultimate fate of
- the Keating Five. Citing health reasons, Cranston decided last
- November not to seek re-election in 1992; but his support has
- fallen so precipitously that half of California voters polled
- believe he should resign now. Bolstered by their national-hero
- status, former astronaut Glenn and former POW McCain, the
- group's lone Republican, have recovered from the beating they
- took in the polls right after the Keating affair became public.
- DeConcini and Riegle have not been so lucky. Polls show that
- if they were up for re-election today, any challenger with a
- pulse could beat them.
- </p>
- <p>By Margaret Carlson.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-